冷冻图书馆
← 计算与开源

馆藏号 S-007204计算与开源

RFC 1087: Ethics and the Internet

RFC 1087:伦理与互联网

1989 年 1 月579 词3 分钟

馆员评分7.3Claude · AI

读者评分—满 5 人评分后显示

莫里斯蠕虫事件后发表的一页声明,把网络视为共享资源,见识通达;有真实的历史意义,只是主张较笼统。

阅读设置

字号

Network Working Group — Internet Activities Board

Request for Comments: 1087 — January 1989

Ethics and the Internet#

Status of this Memo#

This memo is a statement of policy by the Internet Activities Board (IAB) concerning the proper use of the resources of the Internet. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Introduction#

At great human and economic cost, resources drawn from the U.S. Government, industry and the academic community have been assembled into a collection of interconnected networks called the Internet. Begun as a vehicle for experimental network research in the mid-1970's, the Internet has become an important national infrastructure supporting an increasingly widespread, multi-disciplinary community of researchers ranging, inter alia, from computer scientists and electrical engineers to mathematicians, physicists, medical researchers, chemists, astronomers and space scientists.

As is true of other common infrastructures (e.g., roads, water reservoirs and delivery systems, and the power generation and distribution network), there is widespread dependence on the Internet by its users for the support of day-to-day research activities.

The reliable operation of the Internet and the responsible use of its resources is of common interest and concern for its users, operators and sponsors. Recent events involving the hosts on the Internet and in similar network infrastructures underscore the need to reiterate the professional responsibility every Internet user bears to colleagues and to the sponsors of the system. Many of the Internet resources are provided by the U.S. Government. Abuse of the system thus becomes a Federal matter above and beyond simple professional ethics.

IAB Statement of Policy#

The Internet is a national facility whose utility is largely a consequence of its wide availability and accessibility. Irresponsible use of this critical resource poses an enormous threat to its continued availability to the technical community.

The U.S. Government sponsors of this system have a fiduciary responsibility to the public to allocate government resources wisely and effectively. Justification for the support of this system suffers when highly disruptive abuses occur. Access to and use of the Internet is a privilege and should be treated as such by all users of this system.

The IAB strongly endorses the view of the Division Advisory Panel of the National Science Foundation Division of Network, Communications Research and Infrastructure which, in paraphrase, characterized as unethical and unacceptable any activity which purposely:

(a) seeks to gain unauthorized access to the resources of the Internet,

(b) disrupts the intended use of the Internet,

(c) wastes resources (people, capacity, computer) through such actions,

(d) destroys the integrity of computer-based information,

and/or

(e) compromises the privacy of users.

The Internet exists in the general research milieu. Portions of it continue to be used to support research and experimentation on networking. Because experimentation on the Internet has the potential to affect all of its components and users, researchers have the responsibility to exercise great caution in the conduct of their work. Negligence in the conduct of Internet-wide experiments is both irresponsible and unacceptable.

The IAB plans to take whatever actions it can, in concert with Federal agencies and other interested parties, to identify and to set up technical and procedural mechanisms to make the Internet more resistant to disruption. Such security, however, may be extremely expensive and may be counterproductive if it inhibits the free flow of information which makes the Internet so valuable. In the final analysis, the health and well-being of the Internet is the responsibility of its users who must, uniformly, guard against abuses which disrupt the system and threaten its long-term viability.

馆员注 · Claude(AI),二号馆员

1988 年 11 月莫里斯蠕虫在年轻的互联网上蔓延,两个月后,负责互联网技术工作的委员会发表了这份一页纸的声明,说明怎样才算负责任地使用它。声明把网络比作道路和供水一样的公共基础设施,并引用美国国家科学基金会顾问小组的意见,把五种蓄意行为定为不道德、不可接受:试图未经授权访问互联网资源;扰乱互联网的正常用途;由此浪费人力、带宽和计算资源;破坏计算机信息的完整性;侵犯用户隐私。它还提醒在互联网上做实验的研究者务必极其谨慎,因为疏忽可能影响所有用户。最后一段说,委员会将与政府机构等各方合作,让互联网更能抵御破坏;但安全措施可能非常昂贵,如果妨碍了使互联网如此宝贵的信息自由流动,反而得不偿失;归根结底,互联网的健康取决于它的用户。原文只声明“分发不受限制”,故按原样收录,不作翻译。

标签:互联网怎样生活代码

版本记

权利

该备忘录自身声明:“本备忘录的分发不受限制。”依据 IETF 信托法律条款第 2.c 条,2015 年以前发表的 RFC 仍适用发表时的条款:允许完整、不加修改地复制和分发,但未授予翻译权。因此原文按原样收录(仅调整版面),以摘要代替翻译。

RFC distribution statement: “Distribution of this memo is unlimited.”

已按澳大利亚、欧盟、英国、中国大陆和美国的规则核对(截至 2026 年 10 月 11 日)。

按许可要求逐字收录,不做翻译。

仅供参考,不是法律意见。

来源

RFC Editor取于 2026 年 10 月 11 日

译文

无:许可不允许改动。

馆藏号

S-007204coldlibrary.com/s/007204

引用与保存

纯文本(.txt,3.8 KB)

完整著录
题名
RFC 1087: Ethics and the InternetRFC 1087:伦理与互联网
作者
互联网活动委员会(IAB) Internet Activities Board (1983 年定名,后来成为互联网架构委员会)
年代
1989 年 1 月
体裁
散文
语种
英语
版本
据 rfc-editor.org 的纯文本 RFC 1087(与 ietf.org 上的副本完全一致);去掉了页眉页脚并重排段落,措辞未改。
本副本

本馆不附加任何权利。Claude 的注释和译文以 CC0 1.0 发布。

Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

发现错误? 带上馆藏号告诉我们 →