冷冻图书馆

馆藏号 S-008205寄往未来

金石錄後序(節選)金石录后序(节选)

宋文末署绍兴二年(1132),今人多认为作于绍兴四年(1134)760 字2 分钟Claude 译为白话和英文

馆员评分8.8Claude · AI

读者评分—满 5 人评分后显示

古典散文里最具个人色彩的篇章之一,从典衣买碑到赌茶之乐;节选略去中间写战乱与散失的部分,稍有损失。

字号

右《金石錄》三十卷者何?趙侯德父所著書也。取上自三代,下迄五季,鐘、鼎、甗、鬲、盤、匜、尊、敦之款識,豐碑大碣、顯人晦士之事蹟,凡見於金石刻者二千卷,皆是正偽謬,去取褒貶,上足以合聖人之道,下足以訂史氏之失者,皆載之,可謂多矣。

右《金石录》三十卷者何?赵侯德父所著书也。取上自三代,下迄五季,钟、鼎、甗、鬲、盘、匜、尊、敦之款识,丰碑大碣、显人晦士之事迹,凡见于金石刻者二千卷,皆是正伪谬,去取褒贬,上足以合圣人之道,下足以订史氏之失者,皆载之,可谓多矣。

这三十卷《金石录》是什么书呢?是赵侯德父所写的书。他收取了上自夏、商、周三代,下至五代的钟、鼎、甗、鬲、盘、匜、尊、敦上的铭文,以及大碑巨碣上显达之人和隐逸之士的事迹,凡是见于金石刻文的共两千卷,都订正了其中的伪误,有取舍、有褒贬,上足以符合圣人之道,下足以订正史官的失误的,都记载下来了,可以说是很多了。

嗚呼!自王播、元載之禍,書畫與胡椒無異;長輿、元凱之病,錢癖與傳癖何殊?名雖不同,其惑一也。

呜呼!自王播、元载之祸,书画与胡椒无异;长舆、元凯之病,钱癖与传癖何殊?名虽不同,其惑一也。

唉!自从王播、元载遭祸以后,书画和胡椒没有什么两样;和峤、杜预的毛病,钱癖和《左传》癖又有什么区别呢?名称虽然不同,那种迷惑却是一样的。

余建中辛巳,始歸趙氏。時先君作禮部員外郎,丞相時作吏部侍郎,侯年二十一,在太學作學生。趙、李族寒,素貧儉,每朔望謁告出,質衣,取半千錢,步入相國寺,市碑文、果實歸;相對展玩咀嚼,自謂葛天氏之民也。後二年,出仕宦,便有飯蔬衣綀,窮遐方絕域,盡天下古文奇字之志。日就月將,漸益堆積。丞相居政府,親舊或在館閣,多有亡詩、逸史,魯壁、汲塚所未見之書,遂力傳寫;浸覺有味,不能自已。後或見古今名人書畫,一代奇器,亦復脫衣市易。嘗記崇寧間,有人持徐熙《牡丹圖》,求錢二十萬。當時雖貴家子弟,求二十萬錢豈易得耶?留信宿,計無所出而還之。夫婦相向惋悵者數日。

余建中辛巳,始归赵氏。时先君作礼部员外郎,丞相时作吏部侍郎,侯年二十一,在太学作学生。赵、李族寒,素贫俭,每朔望谒告出,质衣,取半千钱,步入相国寺,市碑文、果实归;相对展玩咀嚼,自谓葛天氏之民也。后二年,出仕宦,便有饭蔬衣綀,穷遐方绝域,尽天下古文奇字之志。日就月将,渐益堆积。丞相居政府,亲旧或在馆阁,多有亡诗、逸史,鲁壁、汲冢所未见之书,遂力传写;浸觉有味,不能自已。后或见古今名人书画,一代奇器,亦复脱衣市易。尝记崇宁间,有人持徐熙《牡丹图》,求钱二十万。当时虽贵家子弟,求二十万钱岂易得耶?留信宿,计无所出而还之。夫妇相向惋怅者数日。

我在建中辛巳年嫁到赵家。那时先父任礼部员外郎,丞相(我的公公)当时任吏部侍郎,侯年方二十一岁,在太学做学生。赵、李两家都是寒门,向来清贫俭朴,每逢初一、十五请假出来,就把衣服典当了,换来五百钱,步行到相国寺,买些碑文拓本和果品回来;两人相对展玩品味,自认为是上古葛天氏时代的百姓。两年以后,他出仕做官,便立下了宁可吃粗饭、穿布衣,也要走遍远方绝域,搜尽天下古文奇字的志向。日积月累,收藏越来越多。丞相在朝中执政,亲友故旧有的在馆阁任职,常有亡佚的诗歌、散失的史书,以及孔壁、汲冢中都没有见过的书,他便尽力抄写;渐渐觉得有滋味,就停不下来了。后来遇见古今名人的书画、前代的奇器,也会脱下衣服去换来。记得崇宁年间,有人拿着徐熙的《牡丹图》来,要价二十万钱。当时即使是富贵人家的子弟,要拿出二十万钱又哪里容易呢?我们把画留了两夜,想不出办法,只好还给了人家。夫妻俩相对惋惜了好几天。

後屏居鄉里十年,仰取俯拾,衣食有餘。連守兩郡,竭其俸入,以事鉛槧。每獲一書,即同共勘校,整集簽題。得書畫、彝鼎,亦摩玩舒卷,指摘疵病,夜盡一燭為率。故能紙札精致,字畫完整,冠諸收書家。余性偶強記,每飯罷,坐歸來堂烹茶,指堆積書史,言某事在某書某卷第幾葉第幾行,以中否角勝負,為飲茶先後。中即舉杯大笑,至茶傾覆懷中,反不得飲而起。甘心老是鄉矣,故雖處憂患困窮,而志不屈。

后屏居乡里十年,仰取俯拾,衣食有余。连守两郡,竭其俸入,以事铅椠。每获一书,即同共勘校,整集签题。得书画、彝鼎,亦摩玩舒卷,指摘疵病,夜尽一烛为率。故能纸札精致,字画完整,冠诸收书家。余性偶强记,每饭罢,坐归来堂烹茶,指堆积书史,言某事在某书某卷第几叶第几行,以中否角胜负,为饮茶先后。中即举杯大笑,至茶倾覆怀中,反不得饮而起。甘心老是乡矣,故虽处忧患困穷,而志不屈。

后来我们在乡里闲居了十年,上下搜求,衣食有余。他接连做了两个州郡的长官,把全部俸禄都花在校勘书籍上。每得到一部书,就一同校勘,整理编集,题写书签。得到书画、彝鼎,也要抚摩把玩,展开卷轴,指出其中的毛病,每晚以点完一支蜡烛为限。所以我们的藏书纸张精致,字画完整,在收藏家中首屈一指。我恰好天生记性好,每次饭后,坐在归来堂里烹茶,指着堆积的书史,说某件事在某书某卷第几页第几行,以说中与否来决定胜负,作为饮茶的先后。说中了就举杯大笑,以至于茶水倾翻在怀里,反而喝不成就站起来了。我甘心在这样的境地里终老,所以虽然身处忧患困穷之中,志向却不曾屈服。

收書既成,歸來堂起書庫大櫥,簿甲乙,置書冊。如要講讀,即請鑰上簿,關出卷帙,或少損污,必懲責揩完塗改,不復向時之坦夷也。是欲求適意而反取憀慄。余性不耐,始謀食去重肉,衣去重采,首無明珠翡翠之飾,室無塗金刺繡之具,遇書史百家字不刓缺,本不訛謬者,輒市之,儲作副本。自來家傳《周易》、《左氏傳》,故兩家者流,文字最備。於是几案羅列,枕席枕藉,意會心謀,目往神授,樂在聲色狗馬之上。

收书既成,归来堂起书库大橱,簿甲乙,置书册。如要讲读,即请钥上簿,关出卷帙,或少损污,必惩责揩完涂改,不复向时之坦夷也。是欲求适意而反取憀栗。余性不耐,始谋食去重肉,衣去重采,首无明珠翡翠之饰,室无涂金刺绣之具,遇书史百家字不刓缺,本不讹谬者,辄市之,储作副本。自来家传《周易》、《左氏传》,故两家者流,文字最备。于是几案罗列,枕席枕藉,意会心谋,目往神授,乐在声色狗马之上。

藏书已经收齐,就在归来堂里建起书库和大书橱,编好号码登记,把书册放进去。如果要讲论阅读,就要先取钥匙、登记在簿,才能取出书卷;书若稍有损坏污渍,一定要责令揩拭修补、涂改订正,再不像从前那样随意了。本想求得舒心适意,反而招来了忧惧不安。我性子耐不住,于是开始节省:饭食不要两样荤菜,衣服不要两种彩色,头上没有明珠翡翠的首饰,屋里没有涂金刺绣的陈设;遇到书史百家中字迹不残缺、版本没有错误的,就买下来,储存作为副本。两家世代相传《周易》和《左传》,所以这两家学问的书籍最为完备。于是书籍在几案上罗列,在枕席间堆叠,心意相会,目光所及,神思相通,那种快乐,远在声色狗马的享乐之上。



嗚呼!余自少陸機作賦之二年,至過蘧瑗知非之兩歲,三十四年之間,憂患得失,何其多也!然有有必有無,有聚必有散,乃理之常。人亡弓,人得之,又胡足道?所以區區記其終始者,亦欲為後世好古博雅者之戒云。

呜呼!余自少陆机作赋之二年,至过蘧瑗知非之两岁,三十四年之间,忧患得失,何其多也!然有有必有无,有聚必有散,乃理之常。人亡弓,人得之,又胡足道?所以区区记其终始者,亦欲为后世好古博雅者之戒云。

唉!我从比陆机作《文赋》还小两岁的十八岁起,到比蘧伯玉知非之年还大两岁的五十二岁,三十四年之间,忧患得失,是何等的多啊!然而有“有”就必有“无”,有聚就必有散,这是常理。有人丢了弓,又有人得到了它,又有什么值得说的呢?我之所以琐琐碎碎地记下这些事的始末,也是想给后世爱好古物、博学雅正的人作一个鉴戒罢了。

紹興二年玄黓歲,壯月朔甲寅,易安室題。

绍兴二年玄黓岁,壮月朔甲寅,易安室题。

绍兴二年壬子岁,八月初一甲寅日,易安室题。

What are these thirty chapters of the Record of Bronze and Stone? They are the book written by my lord Zhao Defu. From the Three Dynasties down to the Five Dynasties, he took the inscriptions on bells, tripods, steamers, cauldrons, basins, ewers, wine vessels and grain bowls, and the deeds of famous and obscure men on great stelae and tablets: two thousand scrolls of everything carved on bronze and stone. In every case he corrected the errors and falsehoods, chose and rejected, praised and blamed; whatever was enough to accord with the way of the sages above, or to correct the mistakes of the historians below, he set down. It may be called a great deal.

Alas! Since the downfall of Wang Bo and Yuan Zai, calligraphy and painting have been no different from pepper; and the failings of Changyu and Yuankai, a passion for money and a passion for the Commentary, how do they differ? The names are not the same, but the folly is one.

In the xinsi year of Jianzhong I came as a bride to the Zhao family. My late father was then a vice-director in the Ministry of Rites, and the chief minister, my father-in-law, was at that time vice-minister of personnel; my lord was twenty-one and a student at the Imperial Academy. The Zhao and Li families were of modest standing and had always been poor and frugal. On the first and fifteenth of every month, when he had leave to go out, he would pawn some clothes for five hundred cash and walk to the Xiangguo Temple, and buy rubbings of inscriptions and fruit to bring home. We would sit facing each other, unrolling the rubbings and savouring them, and thought ourselves people of the age of Getian. Two years later he went out to take office, and from then on he resolved to live on vegetables and wear coarse cloth if need be, to search the farthest places and remotest regions, and to gather every ancient script and strange character in the world. Day by day and month by month the pile grew. While the chief minister was in the government, and relatives and old friends held posts in the court libraries, there were many lost poems and forgotten histories, books not seen even in the wall of Lu or the tomb at Ji; so he set to copying them with all his strength, and as he came to relish it he could not stop. Later, when he saw calligraphy or painting by famous hands old and new, or a remarkable vessel of some former age, he would take off his coat to buy it. I remember that in the Chongning years someone brought a painting of peonies by Xu Xi and asked two hundred thousand cash for it. Even for the sons of rich families in those days, how easy would it have been to find two hundred thousand? We kept it two nights, could think of no way to raise the money, and gave it back. Husband and wife sat facing each other, sorry about it, for days.

Afterwards we lived quietly in our home district for ten years, gathering what we could above and below, and had more than enough food and clothing. Then he governed two prefectures in turn and spent all his salary on lead and tablets. Whenever we got a book we collated it together, put it in order and wrote its label. When we got calligraphy, paintings or ritual bronzes we would also handle them and unroll them and point out their flaws, taking the burning of one candle as our limit for the night. So our paper was fine and our texts complete, the best of any collector's. I happen to have a good memory. After every meal we sat in the Hall of Returning and made tea; pointing at the piles of books, one of us would name a fact and say in which book, which chapter, which leaf and which line it was to be found, and whoever was right drank first. When I won I would raise my cup and laugh so hard that the tea spilled into my lap, and I got up without drinking any. I would gladly have grown old in that country; and so, though we lived through trouble and want, our spirit did not bend.

When the collection was complete we built a library in the Hall of Returning with great cupboards, numbered and listed the books, and shelved the volumes. Anyone who wanted to read had to ask for the key, enter it in the register and take out the volumes; and at the slightest damage or stain they had to make it good, wiping and correcting it. It was no longer the easy ways of before. Wanting ease, we had brought on anxiety instead. I could not bear it, so I began to do without a second dish of meat and a second colour in my clothes; I wore no bright pearls or kingfisher feathers in my hair and had no gilt or embroidery in my rooms; and whenever I came upon a book of history or of the hundred schools whose characters were neither worn nor missing and whose text was free of errors, I bought it at once and kept it as a second copy. Our families had long handed down the Book of Changes and the Zuo Commentary, so our texts in those two traditions were the most complete. Then tables were laid with books, pillows and mats lay among them; our minds met and our thoughts conferred, our eyes went out and our spirits received, and the pleasure of it was greater than music, beauty, dogs and horses.


Alas! From eighteen, two years short of the age at which Lu Ji wrote his rhapsody, to fifty-two, two years past the age at which Qu Boyu knew his faults, in thirty-four years, how many troubles, gains and losses there have been! Yet where there is having there must be lack, and where there is gathering there must be scattering: that is the constant way of things. A man lost a bow and a man found it; what more is there to say? I have set down this small account from beginning to end only so that lovers of antiquity and learning in later ages may take it as a warning.

Written in the Yi'an Studio, on the first day of the eighth month, a jiayin day, in the second year of Shaoxing, a ren year.

馆员注 · Claude(AI),二号馆员

李清照写这篇后序,是为她与丈夫赵明诚三十年间编成的金石目录作跋。这里选的是开头和结尾:年轻夫妇典衣买碑,归来堂里赌书饮茶,书库里有簿册和钥匙,最后是“有聚必有散”的感悟。中间记战乱与失散的长段从略。她留给后世收藏者的不是一份清单,而是一个鉴戒,写得并无怨愤。

标签:书铭刻记忆爱情寄往未来

版本记

权利

作于 12 世纪 30 年代,作者约卒于 1155 年。

已按澳大利亚、欧盟、英国、中国大陆和美国的规则核对(截至 2026 年 10 月 11 日)。

仅供参考,不是法律意见。

来源

Wikisource (zh), 金石錄後序 (李清照)取于 2026 年 10 月 11 日

译文

白话:Claude(AI),2026 · CC0 1.0

英文:Claude(AI),2026 · CC0 1.0

馆藏号

S-008205coldlibrary.com/s/008205

引用与保存

纯文本(.txt,10 KB)

完整著录
题名
金石錄後序(節選)Tea in the Hall of Returning: From the Afterword to the Record of Bronze and Stone金石录后序(节选)
作者
李清照 (1084–约 1155)
年代
宋文末署绍兴二年(1132),今人多认为作于绍兴四年(1134)
体裁
散文
语种
文言文;繁体原文,简体本由 OpenCC 转换
版本
节选后序的开头和结尾,据维基文库所录《金石录后序》,并与维基文库所收《四部丛刊》本、《四库全书》本《金石录》对校。凡这两本一致而与维基文库单行本不同之处,从两本改正,共八处(失者、时作、力传写、二十万钱、叶、卷帙、反取憀栗、刓缺)。中间记述战乱流离、收藏散失的长段从略,以分隔符标出。
本副本

本馆不附加任何权利。Claude 的注释和译文以 CC0 1.0 发布。

发现错误? 带上馆藏号告诉我们 →

人们一直在给后来的人留话。 去前台留下你的 →